Avg HR
167 BPM , 85.6%
Max HR
249 BPM , 127.7%
Route
Gullfjellet Rundt 2011
Distance
45.0 km
Ascent
647 m (14.4 m/km)
Descent
640 m
Min altitude
81 m
Max altitude
320 m
Start time
9:59 a.m.
Date
May 8, 2011
Max Speed
73.8 km/h
Temperature
21 ℃
Min Temperature
17 ℃
Max Temperature
26 ℃
Calories
2061 kcal (0.3 kg bodyfat)
Avg Pedaling Cadence
79 RPM
Avg Cadence
72 RPM
  • Max Cadence
    132 RPM
  • Avg Pedaling Power
    293 W 93.0% FTP
    Avg Power
    255 W
    Normalized Power
    299 W
    Intensity Factor
    0.949
    TSS
    228
    Max Power
    1028 W
    xPower
    286 W

    xPower is an alternative to normalized power.

    It's using a 25 sec Exponentially Weighted Moving Average instead of 30 second moving average to Address Variability:

    A 30 second moving average (30s MA) does not account for the fact
    that physiologic response to stress decays with an exponential rather than linear time
    course. A logical / intuitive solution would be to address this with an algorithm that
    provided an appropriate decay pattern. Theoretically, an exponentially weighted moving
    average should provide a more realistic model. (This was in fact the initial basis for the
    development of the xPower and BikeScore algorithms.) We selected a 25 second
    exponentially weighted moving average (25s EWMA) based upon the fact that this should
    track consistently with oxygen kinetics.


    A comprehensive explanation of BikeScore/xPower can be found here: http://www.physfarm.com/bikescore.pdf

    BikeScore is a trademark of Dr. Philip Friere Skiba, PhysFarm Training Systems LLC

    Relative Intensity (RI)
    0.9
    BikeScore

    BikeScore is a proprietary unit designed to measure the overall training stress incurred by the athlete during any training period.

    A 30 second moving average (30s MA) does not account for the fact
    that physiologic response to stress decays with an exponential rather than linear time
    course. A logical / intuitive solution would be to address this with an algorithm that
    provided an appropriate decay pattern. Theoretically, an exponentially weighted moving
    average should provide a more realistic model. (This was in fact the initial basis for the
    development of the xPower and BikeScore algorithms.) We selected a 25 second
    exponentially weighted moving average (25s EWMA) based upon the fact that this should
    track consistently with oxygen kinetics.

    It was was developed by Dr. Phil Skiba. A comprehensive explanation of BikeScore can be found here: http://www.physfarm.com/bikescore.pdf

    BikeScore is a trademark of Dr. Philip Friere Skiba, PhysFarm Training Systems LLC

    209

    Hardt frå start, var eit stykke bak då Gullbotn-bakken starta. Krabba sakte oppover mot teten forbi mange (inkl christian), men greide å rote meg vekk frå pulja mi i utforkjøringane. Utrulig urutinert køyring. Køyrde åleine ganske lenge i motvinden før eg vart teke igjen av christian si gruppe. Skjedde eit stygt fall i ein sving der eg såvidt greide å styre unna, var eit par andre som kjørte over han som datt. Pga det så sprakk gruppa opp, og eg køyrde med ca 5-6 mann inn til Fanafjellet. Køyrde frå alle dei opp bakken og tok inn eit par til.

    Alt i alt greit nøgd med beina, men dårlig taktisk køyring.

    Loading graph...


    spinner
    Loading selection information...
    • m
    • m
    • BPM
    • BPM
    • BPM
    • deg
    • VAM
    • km/h
    • km/h
    • km/h
    • RPM
    • RPM
    • RPM
    • W
    • W
    • W
    • W
    • W
    • Tor Hveem writes:

      Hardt frå start, var eit stykke bak då Gullbotn-bakken starta. Krabba sakte oppover mot teten forbi mange (inkl christian), men greide å rote meg vekk frå pulja mi i utforkjøringane. Utrulig urutinert køyring. Køyrde åleine ganske lenge i motvinden før eg vart teke igjen av christian si gruppe. Skjedde eit stygt fall i ein sving der eg såvidt greide å styre unna, var eit par andre som kjørte over han som datt. Pga det så sprakk gruppa opp, og eg køyrde med ca 5-6 mann inn til Fanafjellet. Køyrde frå alle dei opp bakken og tok inn eit par til.

      Alt i alt greit nøgd med beina, men dårlig taktisk køyring.


    Login (or Sign Up) to leave a comment
    Zoom Start Tid Lengd Elevation Fart Gj. effekt FTP % Avg power/kg Maks effekt Puls Avg cadence Makskadens
    09:59, 0 km 57:14 37.5 km +308/-291 m 39.4 km/h 230 W 73.0% 2.8 W/kg 1028 W 82.1% 80 RPM 132 RPM
    10:57, 37.5 km 01:34:51 50.5 km +916/-741 m 32.0 km/h 271 W 86.0% 3.3 W/kg 959 W 87.7% 78 RPM 120 RPM

    Time in power zones

    Zone Duration %
    1 (0% - 55%) 45 minutes 36 seconds 30.0%
    2 (55% - 75%) 20 minutes 37 seconds 13.6%
    3 (75% - 90%) 16 minutes 41 seconds 11.0%
    4 (90% - 105%) 19 minutes 12 seconds 12.6%
    5 (105% - 121%) 19 minutes 16 seconds 12.7%
    6 (121% - 150%) 18 minutes 19 seconds 12.0%
    7 (150% - 12 minutes 45 seconds 8.4%

    Time in HR zones

    Zone Duration %
    0 (0% - 60%) 20 seconds 0.2%
    1 (60% - 72%) 5 minutes 27 seconds 3.6%
    2 (72% - 82%) 37 minutes 28 seconds 24.6%
    3 (82% - 87%) 51 minutes 25 seconds 33.8%
    4 (87% - 92%) 40 minutes 39 seconds 26.7%
    5 (92% - 97%) 7 minutes 30 seconds 4.9%
    6 (97% - 100% 9 minutes 37 seconds 6.3%

    Percentage of time spent in different HR, colored by zones

    Power distribution

    Cadence distribution

    Speed distribution

    Name Start Length Ascent % Duration Speed Avg power Est power W/kg VAM Category Avg HR
    6.9 km 5.0 km 93 m 1.9 % 09:00 33.7 km/h 284.2 W 383.8 W 3.4 W/kg
    4
    85.6%
    26.2 km 4.2 km 40 m 1.0 % 06:38 38.2 km/h 244.7 W 406.0 W 2.9 W/kg
    5
    79.5%
    37.0 km 3.2 km 225 m 7.0 % 11:18 17.2 km/h 357.2 W 352.1 W 4.3 W/kg 1195
    3
    89.2%
    Gullbotten 37.0 km 3.2 km 224 m 6.9 % 11:18 17.2 km/h 357 W 351.6 W 4.3 W/kg 1189
    3
    89.2%
    61.3 km 2.0 km 117 m 5.8 % 06:34 18.6 km/h 346.7 W 329.2 W 4.2 W/kg
    4
    87.2%
    74.4 km 1.5 km 40 m 2.7 % 03:09 28.6 km/h 298.7 W 345.0 W 3.6 W/kg
    5
    83.1%
    84.6 km 3.4 km 202 m 6.0 % 11:39 17.3 km/h 307.8 W 313.8 W 3.7 W/kg 1041
    3
    84.6%
    Fanafjell frå U... 85.0 km 3.0 km 201 m 6.6 % 11:09 16.4 km/h 311 W 319.9 W 3.7 W/kg 1082
    3
    85.1%
    Zoom Duration Power Avg power/kg Start Length Elevation
    5 seconds 790 W 9.5 W/kg 20.3 km 77 m +0 / -0 m
    10 seconds 716 W 8.6 W/kg 46.7 km 113 m +1 / -0 m
    30 seconds 527 W 6.3 W/kg 51.7 km 223 m +15 / -0 m
    1 minute 471 W 5.7 W/kg 51.2 km 674 m +16 / -7 m
    4 minutes 379 W 4.6 W/kg 38.0 km 1068 m +84 / -0 m
    5 minutes 376 W 4.5 W/kg 38.0 km 1310 m +104 / -0 m
    10 minutes 370 W 4.5 W/kg 37.6 km 2592 m +202 / -0 m
    20 minutes 302 W 3.6 W/kg 31.4 km 8814 m +251 / -39 m
    30 minutes 297 W 3.6 W/kg 36.8 km 16.5 km +341 / -344 m
    1 hour 276 W 3.3 W/kg 30.4 km 32.9 km +539 / -474 m
    Zoom Duration Speed Start Length Elevation
    5 seconds 73.1 km/h 82.1 km 101 m +0 / -6 m
    10 seconds 71.8 km/h 82.1 km 199 m +0 / -12 m
    30 seconds 67.1 km/h 42.6 km 558 m +0 / -33 m
    1 minute 64.4 km/h 42.2 km 1073 m +0 / -64 m
    4 minutes 53.0 km/h 42.3 km 3536 m +4 / -177 m
    5 minutes 52.9 km/h 42.2 km 4406 m +9 / -212 m
    10 minutes 48.6 km/h 15.6 km 8112 m +44 / -99 m
    20 minutes 45.5 km/h 12.0 km 15.1 km +113 / -183 m
    30 minutes 43.3 km/h 11.9 km 21.6 km +152 / -198 m
    1 hour 38.3 km/h 0.0 km 38.2 km +365 / -289 m